Comparison

Type 0 vs Type 1 Control System

A position control system that holds a printer head at a fixed coordinate is fighting a constant position error if the open-loop transfer function has no integrator — that is a Type 0 system. Add one integrator (one pole at the origin in G(s)H(s)) and the position error drops to zero for a step input; now you have a Type 1 system. The number of open-loop poles at the origin defines the system type and directly determines which class of inputs the system tracks without steady-state error.

EEE, ECE

Side-by-side comparison

ParameterType 0Type 1 Control System
DefinitionZero poles at s = 0 in G(s)H(s)One pole at s = 0 in G(s)H(s)
Position error constant KpFinite (= K, the open-loop DC gain)Infinite
Velocity error constant KvZeroFinite (= K)
Acceleration error constant KaZeroZero
Steady-state error, step input1/(1+Kp) — finiteZero
Steady-state error, ramp inputInfinite1/Kv — finite
Steady-state error, parabolic inputInfiniteInfinite
Typical exampleProportional controller with purely resistive plantPI controller, or plant with motor integrator
Stability concernEasier to stabiliseIntegrator reduces phase margin by 90°

Key differences

Type 0 systems have no integrator in the forward path; they eliminate position error only if loop gain K is infinitely large — impractical. Type 1 systems have exactly one integrator, giving Kp = ∞ and zero position error for step inputs, but Kv = K (finite) so a ramp input still produces error = 1/K. Each additional integrator increases the system type by one, buys zero error for one more class of input, but costs 90° of phase margin per integrator, making stability harder to maintain.

When to use Type 0

Use a Type 0 system (proportional control only) when tracking a constant setpoint with a small offset tolerable — a simple lamp dimmer circuit with manual setpoint adjustment is adequately served by Type 0.

When to use Type 1 Control System

Use a Type 1 system when the reference is a step signal that must be tracked with zero steady-state error — an elevator position controller uses an integrating drive (Type 1) to park exactly at floor level without residual error.

Recommendation

For university exams, choose Type 1 as the default answer whenever zero position error for step input is required. Remember: one integrator = one free error class eliminated. Adding more integrators without compensators will likely destabilise the system.

Exam tip: GATE directly asks: "What is the steady-state error for a ramp input to a Type 1 system with gain K?" — the answer is 1/K, and you must also state that the velocity error constant Kv = K.

Interview tip: Interviewers expect you to instantly classify a given G(s)H(s) by counting poles at the origin and to state the corresponding steady-state error for step, ramp, and parabolic inputs from memory.

More Control Systems comparisons