Comparison

Class C vs Class D Amplifier

The RF power amplifier in a 100 MHz FM transmitter runs class C — the transistor conducts for less than 90° per cycle, and a high-Q LC tank reconstructs the full sine wave. A PAM8403 class D amplifier in a Bluetooth speaker runs at 250 kHz PWM and delivers 3 W into 4 Ω at over 90% efficiency. Both hit efficiencies that class A and B cannot reach, but through completely different mechanisms. Confusing them in an exam answer can cost marks fast.

EEE, ECE, EI

Side-by-side comparison

ParameterClass CClass D Amplifier
Conduction angleLess than 180° (typically 90–150°)Varies (PWM switching; not sine-wave conduction)
Operating principleTuned tank circuit recovers fundamental frequencyPWM switching; LC filter reconstructs audio signal
Efficiency (η)Up to 90–95% (at low conduction angles)85–95% (PAM8403: ~90% at 1 W into 4 Ω)
LinearityHighly non-linear; not suitable for AM audioHigh linearity with feedback; THD < 0.1% (TPA3116)
Output filter requiredHigh-Q LC tank (tuned to carrier frequency)LC low-pass filter (cutoff ~20 kHz)
Frequency rangeRF: 1 MHz–1 GHz+Audio: 20 Hz–20 kHz signal; carrier 200 kHz–1 MHz
DistortionVery high harmonic distortion without tuned loadLow with proper filter; audible artifacts if EMI is bad
ApplicationFM transmitters, CB radios, satellite uplinksBluetooth speakers, soundbars, car audio (TPA3116, PAM8403)
Drive signalSine wave at carrier frequencyPWM signal from comparator or digital modulator
Device examplesMRF300AN RF transistor, BLF188XR (GaN RF)TPA3116D2, PAM8403, IRS2092

Key differences

Class C amplifiers conduct for less than 180° — the transistor is biased below cutoff and fires only on the peaks of the drive signal. The missing portion of the waveform is irrelevant because the high-Q tuned tank stores energy and delivers a clean sine wave at the output. This makes class C completely unusable for audio (which is wideband) and ideal for single-frequency RF carriers. Class D abandons sine-wave conduction entirely — the output transistors are switches (MOSFETs in TPA3116) toggling at 200–500 kHz in PWM mode. The duty cycle encodes the audio amplitude; a 20 kHz LC filter strips the carrier and passes only audio. TPA3116D2 achieves 98% efficiency at 25 W into 4 Ω — impossible for class C at audio frequencies. Class D's main issue is EMI from the high-frequency switching; class C's main issue is narrow bandwidth, confined to its tank resonance.

When to use Class C

Use class C when amplifying a fixed RF carrier frequency — FM broadcast (88–108 MHz), CB (27 MHz), or satellite uplink. An MRF300AN in a class C stage with a tuned 100 MHz tank delivers 300 W RF output at ~90% efficiency; the tank eliminates all harmonics beyond the fundamental.

When to use Class D Amplifier

Use class D in any battery-powered or efficiency-critical audio application where size and heat dissipation matter. A PAM8403 class D amplifier IC delivers 3 W + 3 W stereo into 4 Ω from a 5 V USB supply with no heatsink needed, consuming less than 15 mA at idle.

Recommendation

Choose class D for any audio amplification task — it's efficient, integrable, and produces low distortion with the built-in LC filter. Choose class C only when amplifying a single RF carrier frequency where a tuned tank filter can be used. These two classes solve completely different problems and are never interchangeable.

Exam tip: University papers ask students to explain why class C cannot amplify audio signals directly — the answer must cite both the non-linearity (only peak conduction) and the fact that a tuned tank is narrowband; an audio signal's bandwidth of 20 kHz cannot be recovered from a single resonant frequency.

Interview tip: Core electronics interviewers ask how class D achieves high efficiency despite using active transistors — the expected answer is that MOSFETs operate as switches (fully ON or fully OFF), so they spend minimal time in the resistive linear region where V × I is non-zero and power is wasted.

More Analog Electronics comparisons