Comparison

Real Power vs Reactive Power

A 100 kVA transformer supplying a factory floor carries both real power (the kW doing actual work — driving motors, lighting) and reactive power (the kVAR magnetizing those motor windings). If the power factor is 0.7 lagging, only 70 kW of real work is done while 71.4 kVAR circulates between the source and the load inductance — heating cables and loading the transformer without contributing to production output. TNEB imposes a penalty tariff when power factor drops below 0.85. Adding capacitor banks corrects this. That economic reality is why every power systems engineer must understand the power triangle.

EEE

Side-by-side comparison

ParameterReal PowerReactive Power
Symbol and UnitP — measured in Watts (W) or kWQ — measured in Volt-Ampere Reactive (VAR) or kVAR
Physical MeaningRate of actual energy conversion (mechanical work, heat, light)Energy oscillating between source and reactive element (L or C); no net energy consumed
FormulaP = V × I × cos φ (W)Q = V × I × sin φ (VAR)
Power Factor AngleP = S × cos φ; P is adjacent side of power triangleQ = S × sin φ; Q is opposite side
Effect of Inductive LoadUnchanged — real power consumed by resistancePositive Q — inductors absorb reactive power (lagging PF)
Effect of Capacitive LoadUnchangedNegative Q — capacitors generate reactive power (leading PF)
Apparent Power RelationshipS² = P² + Q²; P = S × cos φQ = S × sin φ; Q = P × tan φ
Billing ImpactBilled directly — kWh consumedPenalized if kVAR excessive — low PF tariff (TNEB below 0.85)
Correction MethodIncrease load efficiency to reduce P for same outputAdd shunt capacitor bank (kVAR compensation) to cancel inductive Q
Measurement InstrumentWattmeter (electrodynamometer type)VAR meter or power factor meter

Key differences

Real power P (watts) represents energy permanently transferred from source to load per second — resistors convert it to heat, motors to mechanical work, lamps to light. Reactive power Q (VAR) represents energy oscillating between the source and the magnetic field of inductors (or electric field of capacitors) at twice the supply frequency — it does no net work. The apparent power S = √(P² + Q²) is what the generator and transmission lines must carry regardless. At PF = 0.7, the same cable carrying 70 kW of real power also carries 71.4 kVAR of reactive current, heating the conductors and wasting cable capacity. A 71.4 kVAR capacitor bank at the load terminates eliminates this, reducing S to equal P and recovering full cable capacity.

When to use Real Power

Reduce reactive power by installing shunt capacitor banks at the load terminals — a factory running 200 kW at PF=0.75 lagging needs 176 kVAR of capacitance (Q_c = P × tan(arccos 0.75) − P × tan(arccos 0.95)) to improve PF to 0.95 and avoid TNEB penalty tariff.

When to use Reactive Power

Maximize real power efficiency by selecting high-efficiency motors (IE3 rating), LED lighting, and resistive heating elements that have power factor near unity — these reduce apparent power demand and eliminate reactive current circulation in the distribution network.

Recommendation

Real power pays the bills; reactive power costs you in penalized tariffs and underutilized cable capacity. Always target PF above 0.90 in industrial installations using capacitor banks. For GATE: know the power triangle cold — draw it, label P, Q, S, and φ, and derive any one quantity given two others in under 30 seconds.

Exam tip: Examiners draw the power triangle and ask you to calculate the capacitor kVAR needed to improve PF from 0.7 to 0.95 for a 100 kW load — apply Q_c = 100×(tan(cos⁻¹ 0.7) − tan(cos⁻¹ 0.95)) = 100×(1.020 − 0.329) = 69.1 kVAR.

Interview tip: Interviewers at PGCIL, NTPC, and distribution companies ask why reactive power causes voltage drop in distribution lines — explain that reactive current in line impedance creates a voltage drop component (IX term) that reduces receiving-end voltage, separate from the IR drop from real current.

More Power Systems comparisons